Orly Taitz gets slapped around by yet another judge.

Oct 29 2009 Published by under Flaming Small-Minded Stupidity

Great White, Tiger, Lemon, White-Tip, Hammerhead - you name a species of shark, and Orly Taitz DDS Esq. has jumped it. She hasn't just gone off the deep end, she's gone of the Challenger Deep. One of her more recent blog posts should be more than enough proof of that for anyone:

If Obama is not legitimate, neither are his appointments, including his pick of Biden. We will need to have a new election ASAP, before these diabolical psychopaths completely destroy US economy, currency and unleash some bio engineered swine flu virus as an excuse for martial law and suspension of our constitutional freedoms

(Constitutional Lawyer/Dentist Taitz is apparently ignorant of the 20th Amendment to the US Constitution - not to mention the fact that the Vice President is also elected, not appointed.)

However, if you're looking for more evidence for that, there's a quote in the most recent ruling throwing a birther case out of the courts that might help you out:

While the Court has no desire to chill Plaintiffs' enthusiastic presentation, Taitz's argument often hampered the efforts of her cocounsel Gary Kreep ("Kreep"), counsel for Plaintiffs Drake and Robinson, to bring serious issues before the Court.

Seriously, when the judge who is dismissing yet another Bither case takes time to express sympathy for the difficulties she's caused other bithers, you know she's really hit the bottom.

I hope.

30 responses so far

  • Bob O'H says:

    Bither -> Birther throughout.
    I guess i should apologise to any US judges for wanting Taitz to continue her battle. She's just too entertaining.

  • PalMD says:

    The Court has a word for such a refusal to follow the orders of the President of the United States, but it will leave the issue to the military to resolve.

    HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

  • Eamon Knight says:

    Bither -> Birther throughout.
    Aw, just call them Blitherers.

  • Also note the section where the judge expresses concern that Olrly Taitz may have been trying to suborn perjury.
    I really can't tell at this point if Taitz is evil, crazy, incompetent or some combination. My guess is all three.

  • Paul says:

    Judge land and now judge Carter, smack down the crazies (case dismissed), poor little Birthers.
    Not even “Fake News” Bill O’Reilly believes the crazies, how funny.
    http://belowthebeltway.com/2009/10/29/bill-oreilly-slams-orly-taitz/
    To all the birthers in La, La Land, it is on you to prove to all of us that your assertion is true (TOUGH WHEN YOU KEEP LOSING CASES), if there are people who were there and support your position then show us the video (everyone has a price), either put up or frankly shut-up. I heard Orly Taitz, is selling a tape (I think it’s called “Money, Lies and Video tape”). She is from Orange County, CA, now I know what the mean when they say “behind the Orange Curtain”, when they talk about Orange County, the captial of Conspiracy Theories. You know Obama has a passport, he travel abroad before he was a Senator, but I guess they were in on it.
    In my opinion the Republican Party has been taken over the most extreme religious right (people who love to push their beliefs on others while trying to take away the rights of those they just hate) and that’s who they need to extract from their party if they real want to win. Good Luck, because as they said in WACO, “We Ain’t Coming Out”.
    I heard that she now wants to investigate the “Republican 2009 Summer of Love” list: Assemblyman, Michael D. Duvall (CA), Senator John Ensign (NV), Senator Paul Stanley (TN), Governor Mark Stanford (SC), Board of Ed Chair, and Kristin Maguire AKA Bridget Keeney (SC).

  • oceansider says:

    wow, I will be sorry to see this story die. Carters decision was quite entertaining. Check out the reactions on Orly Taitz own website, http://www.orlytaitzesq.com , the stuff she is spouting off about is likely to at least get her suspended by the California Bar, if not disbarred.

  • Sam C says:

    Awwwww, this ruling isn't as laugh-out-loud funny as Judge Land's demolition of Taitz's nonsense. But the last paragraph of the judgement shows a flicker of Judge Carter's probable annoyance:

    Plaintiffs have attacked the judiciary, including every prior court that has dismissed their claim, as unpatriotic and even treasonous for refusing to grant their requests and for adhering to the terms of the Constitution which set forth its jurisdiction. Respecting the constitutional role and jurisdiction of this court is not unpatriotic. Quite the contrary, this Court considers commitment to that constitutional role to be the ultimate reflection of patriotism.

    Sounds like the judge got a bit tired of hearing these lunatic traitors and duty-dodgers calling themselves "patriotic" and insulting anybody who did care about their country.
    People make fun of Taitz being a dentist, but isn't it scary? Would you really want that woman poking around in your mouth with sharp objects? Heck, that's worrying!

  • Oily Taint says:

    She's here illegally.
    That's right. Ms.'Oily Taint' is not even a US citizen. She's been asked to produce her proof of legal residency and has to date refused to do so.
    Someone making such a big 'to-do' about this kind of thing would demonstrate the point by producing her "papers."
    Fact is, she is simply a racist native of Eastern Europe who sees Obama being in office as acceptable as an evil gorilla being elected president.
    Send 'Oily Taint' back to where she belongs. She's scared of anyone darker than her dentists smock.

  • Captain Obvious says:

    My sanity still demands I believe she is just a colossal troll. The stuff she comes out with is hilariously unbelievable, even her name points to trolldom.
    I fear she is serious though.

  • Montana says:

    The Birthers hate and can't debate.

  • Jack says:

    JUDGE CARTER IN A NUTSHELL: Expanded Orly Taitz default judgment case against CANDIDATE Obama for fraud into a Presidential Removal case against PRESIDENT Obama (promising a trial), but then ruled the Court lacks said Presidential Removal authority, not only dismissing the Judge-expanded Presidential Removal case (reneging on the trial), but throwing out Orly's Candidate fraud case as well -- all this on a red herring that Orly's case was filed 1/20/09 after Obama was sworn in on 1/20/09 despite Obama was sworn in on 1/21/09 and despite the Orly-alleged fraud was committed by Candidate Obama prior to becoming President and for which there is no Presidential immunity in any case. Thus Judge Carter set up and knocked down his own straw man, and misstated fact and law to bury Orly's actual case. Pretty nifty!!!

  • jufulu, FCD says:

    Jack @ 11:
    You best be careful. You're transporting a large amount of hazardous waste there and I'm betting that you have it improperly contained.
    Just saying.

  • Attorney says:

    The Obama/Holder/DOJ loons posting in defense of Obama on every website that speaks against the administration are PAID WITH OUR TAX DOLLARS to blog, search “The Obama Justice Department’s Secret Blogging Team… Is it Illegal?” and see for yourself! Also search “TRACY RUSSO, DOJ BLOGGERS” and learn how “BIG” (ACTUALLY MASSIVE!) TRACY RUSSO and the DOJ are ILLEGALLY wasting OUR TAX DOLLARS TO SUPPORT THE TOTALLY EVIL MARXIST, GLOBALIST POLICIES of CONSTITUTIONALLY ILLEGAL OBAMA! OBAMA HAS ALMOST NO “GRASSROOTS SUPPORT”, THE FALSE IMPRESSION HE DOES IS BEING FOSTERED and FED BY THE DOJ PAID BLOGGING TEAM! HOW LOW WILL WE ALLOW OBAMA/HOLDER/DOJ TO STOOP BEFORE THE UPSTANDING CITIZENS of THIS NATION ARISE AND FIGHT?! THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION IS A TOTAL DISGRACE FROM TOP TO BOTTOM!

  • Traffic Demon says:

    #13 - Either your cat is gradually settling down on your capslock key, or you are insane. I don't believe that you own a cat.

  • Luna_the_cat says:

    Oh, I doubt we're anywhere near the bottom of this. As the great Leonard Cohen once said, "There is no bottom to 'worse'."

  • Prup (aka Jim Benton) says:

    Hello again, Jack. (He posts the same comment to every anti-birther thread.) I've already had my swing at the Pinata today, but feel free to take your own whacks.

  • DingoJack says:

    Attorney - Really? When can I expect my cheque from the US TAXPAYERS? 😉 - DJ

  • borderraven says:

    I'm sorry you all got so easily distracted by the agent provocateurs in the blogs, who turned your focus to Orly Taitz. All she is doing is is defending all of us from apparent tyranny against the US Constitution.
    CAVEAT: It has nothing to do with Repubs v Dems, or race. It does have to do with procedure, evidence (physical and admissible heresay)and trust.
    Taitz, and everybody supporting her angle of attack, have become the focus of your time. Kenya was a long shot but the "footprint" document makes it most convincing. Judge Carter's court was infiltrated by Obama supporters.
    Rhodes was a "proxy" case representing all the military. One person out of the war won't win or lose a battle. Military folks want an answer under UCMJ Article 138, if their CINC is legit. No problem if Obama is not eligible, as 25th Amendment covers it. What's the big deal about no challenging Obama's eligibility to the full satisfaction of the minority who can see there is something critically wrong, in how the US Constitution was skirted?
    Berg is challenging the Senate on how they qualify members, and who let Obama in. The Senate is the birthplace of US laws and we need a high standard for who gets in.
    There will be appeals and more trials. It is a continuous process of improvement and refinement of method and tactics.
    Millions of Americans are conducting individual research into state and federal laws, to determine culpability and accountability.
    A writ of quo warranto and impeachment should be in the works.
    A silent majority of lazy voters, have awakened. You can expect changes in elections codes, citizenship laws, voter registrations and elections turnouts.
    A stronger third party will emerge, as the Ass and Elephant are sent to pasture.

  • Montana says:

    The Birthers are haters not debaters, all talk no brains.

  • Incredulous says:

    Just like Jack and Attorney - Borderraven arrives to bring his particular brand of delusion and ignorance. I say delusion because you seem to have kept you head about you, but you are ignorant. I mean ignorant very precisely, you are ignorant of the facts, why you maintain this ignorance is beyond me.
    "It has everything to do with procedure and evidence."
    You are correct. You have no evidence and no Birther, especially Ms. Taitz, is following proper procedure. The COLB is all the evidence of his legitimate Hawaiian birth required by any court in this land. To call into question his legitimacy to hold office you must have proof of foreign birth AND proof of bureaucratic malfeasance in Hawaii. When you have this evidence, you must bring it to Congress and convince the proper majorities to act on it.
    "A stronger third party will emerge"
    If this party is populated by people who are so blatantly ignorant of the facts, such as yourself, it will not fare well.

  • Majority Will says:

    "borderraven"
    Give it up, Nance-y boy. You're still delusional and irrelevant. Your fantasies of a magic legal fix to your paranoid lunacy are desperate and pathetic.

  • Majority Will says:

    And Berg, Taitz and Donofrio are more likely to get sanctioned (again) and eventually disbarred.

  • red rabbit says:

    Posted at her site by me (I couldn't resist):
    "Dear Ms. Taitz:
    Great job with that case brought in front of Justice Carter. Just read his ruling. Sounds like you really showed him what you’re made of.
    I can’t get your paypal links to work. You may want to check them out. Soliciting money over the internet is the mark of a truly classy movement, so stay classy."
    It was fun to be a bit mean. What a joke.

  • borderraven says:

    14th Amendment: "1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States..."
    If, big IF, Barack H. Obama II, was "born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof;" he is simply a US citizen, on his mother's side.
    But, it takes two persons to make a baby, and those two people are subject national jurisdictions.
    The first part of the 14th Amendment "All persons born or naturalized in the United States" is an "OR GATE" meaning either of the attributes "born in USA " or "naturalized in USA" meet first qualification.
    The second part of the 14th Amendment "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof", begins with an "AND GATE" meaning what follows applies to either of the two previous qualifications. Jurisdiction, in this sense refers to
    national laws and international treaties, concerning travel, migration, extradition, etc.
    http://travel.state.gov/travel/cis_pa_tw/cis/cis_1753.html
    Dual Nationality
    The concept of dual nationality means that a person is a citizen of two countries at the same time. Each country has its own citizenship laws based on its own policy. Persons may have dual nationality by automatic operation of different laws rather than by choice. ....
    US State Department
    .... dual nationals owe allegiance to both the United States and the foreign country. They are required to obey the laws of both countries. Either country has the right to enforce its laws, particularly if the person later travels there. ....
    Barack Hussein Obama II, was born in Hawaii, to two persons, one a US citizen, the other a British subject.
    Resulting from his US parent Hawaii is his place of birth and he is a US citizen. Resulting from his British parent
    Hawaii is his place of birth and he is a British citizen.
    Barack Hussein Obama II, was born in Hawaii, and he is a dual national.
    By continuing the US Presidency of Barack Hussein Obama II, the USA has effectively nullified the Declaration of Independence and surrendered to the British, without a single shot or bloodshed.
    By continuing the presidency of a dual-national, the USA sets a dangerous precedent, whereby all dual-nationals, regardless of their renouncing their foreign citizenship, can attempt to gain control, and eventually will gain control of the USA, within the US Constitution. Don't let us go down that road.

  • Brian X says:

    borderraven:
    The DoI has no legal force to begin with. While it is a historical document of inestimable significance, the United States became a de jure independent country with the treaty of Paris in 1783; it had been de facto independent since the the battle of Yorktown two years earlier, and before that had been a loose confederation of de facto independent states in rebellion against Britain since 1775. Even then, the DoI was more or less a rubber stamp stating the intent of the colonists to secede from Britain; it provided a casus belli, but the revolt was already in full swing by that point.

  • Paul says:

    Dear Birthers:
    Here is the point, your side has not won a case, I know, I know, you have real facts but when shown to a real judge he throws you out on your fat white ass.
    Now I understand, you get your proof is on the internet (Make Believe) so when you get to a USA Court of Law (Real World) you lose.
    Win a case and then many of us will start to believe, till then, you guys are seen as Jokesters, Crazies or just plain Racists (or maybe all of them).
    Please find your tin hats and stop listening to the voices in your head.
    Frankly, Either put up or shutup!
    Deal with that. But really thanks for the laughs. You guys are better than watching Comedy Central.

  • Monado says:

    Let's see... the candidate presents proof of citizenship and age and is elected Senator. He later presents proof of natural-born citizenship and age and is elected President by a popular vote of nearly seventy million. ORLY decides that only removing him from office will satisfy her paranoid fantasies. When a judge writes a carefully considered judgement, giving them more consideration than they deserve, and dismisses the case on the grounds that it does not show injury, has no means to redress the injury, and can not usurp the function of Congress, her supporters show up here claiming that they've been had and they'll be back. ORLY? There truly is no bottom to stupidity.
    PZ was right. They really do have a fantasy that they can sweep away the entire democratically elected government and put in their own favourites. You know what's really weird? This was supposed to be a complaint against the government, yet the plaintiffs insisted on including the First Lady, who is not a member of government. They just couldn't bear not to attack her, too.

  • Monado says:

    Lunatic Jack, the judge did not expand a case against a candidate; he pointed out that the plaintiffs did not file until after the candidate was sworn in as President, and asked why the plaintiffs had delayed.
    It's about time ORLY and her fellow traitors were had up for barratry.

  • garyrose says:

    YOU KNOW PEOPLE EITHER NOT ALERT OR MATURE? MAKE FUN OF ORLY TAITZ WHAT HAPPENS WHEN THE TRUTH IS FORCED OUT?THIS IS WHAT IS HAPPENING RIGHT NOW GET READY? I BELIEVE ANYBODY THAT WILL SPEND LARGE SUMS OF MONEY BULLY PEOPLE ARE GUILTY OF SOMETHING. SO NOW ALL YOU UNOPEN MINDED OBAMA WORSHIPPERS OPEN YOUR EYES? LETS GET THE TRUTH OUT NOW RIGHT NOW? A BIRTH CERTIFICATE CARRYING LEGAL AMERICAN>>>P.S. THANKS SO MUCH ORLY TAITZ>>>>>>>

  • NJ says:

    Gary needs his meds, stat!